BSJV vs IVV
BSJV vs IVV
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJV | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $106M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.60% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 196 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +0.86% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.38% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.7% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 20, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
BSJV vs IVV Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2031 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJV) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year BSJV returned +4.38% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, BSJV is up 0.86% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.9% for BSJV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.7% for BSJV and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJV charges 0.42% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $3 annually, a gap of $39 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJV currently yields 6.60% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
BSJV and IVV share 0 holdings out of 651 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJV or IVV?
BSJV has an expense ratio of 0.42% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $39 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJV or IVV?
Over the past year BSJV returned +4.38% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), BSJV annualized +9.38% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJV or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.9% for BSJV. Worst drawdown: BSJV -4.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both BSJV and IVV?
BSJV and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJV and IVV?
BSJV and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 651 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJV or IVV?
BSJV yields 6.60% while IVV yields 1.09%, so BSJV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.