BSJT vs QQQ
BSJT vs QQQ
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BSJT offers more diversification with 318 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BSJT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.42% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $559M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.69% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 330 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +1.62% | +12.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.20% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +8.21% | +22.30% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.24% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BSJT vs QQQ Performance
Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BSJT returned +5.20% while QQQ returned +22.35%. Year to date, BSJT is up 1.62% versus a gain of 12.48% for QQQ.
Over three years, BSJT compounded at +8.21% per year against +22.30% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +12.91% annualized vs +2.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 8.8% for BSJT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.6% for BSJT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BSJT charges 0.42% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $42 vs $18 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BSJT currently yields 6.69% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BSJT and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 421 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BSJT or QQQ?
BSJT has an expense ratio of 0.42% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $24 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BSJT or QQQ?
Over the past year BSJT returned +5.20% vs +22.35% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), BSJT annualized +2.69% vs +12.91% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BSJT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 8.8% for BSJT. Worst drawdown: BSJT -19.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BSJT and QQQ?
BSJT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BSJT and QQQ?
BSJT and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 421 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BSJT or QQQ?
BSJT yields 6.69% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BSJT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.