BKAG vs VXUS
BKAG vs VXUS
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
BKAG has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BKAG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.00% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.2B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.22% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5,305 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.63% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +2.72% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.78% | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.55% | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.9% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | BNY Mellon Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 22, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
BKAG vs VXUS Performance
BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKAG returned +2.72% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, BKAG is down 0.63% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Over three years, BKAG compounded at +3.78% per year against +17.24% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -0.55% and +8.71% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.66% annualized vs -0.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.9% for BKAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for BKAG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BKAG charges 0.00% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $5 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKAG currently yields 4.22% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
BKAG and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 12293 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BKAG or VXUS?
BKAG has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VXUS charges 0.05%. BKAG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $5 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BKAG or VXUS?
Over the past year BKAG returned +2.72% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKAG annualized -0.33% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BKAG or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.9% for BKAG. Worst drawdown: BKAG -19.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both BKAG and VXUS?
BKAG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BKAG and VXUS?
BKAG and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 12293 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BKAG or VXUS?
BKAG yields 4.22% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so BKAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.