BKAG vs VOO

Quick Verdict

BKAG has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. BKAG offers more diversification with 4433 holdings.

Lower Fees: BKAGHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: BKAG

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricBKAGVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.00%0.03%
AUM$2.2B$979.0B
Dividend Yield4.22%1.09%
Holdings5,305509
YTD Return-0.41%+13.53%
1Y Return+2.10%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+3.98%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)-0.52%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)5.8%14.1%
Max Drawdown-19.2%-34.3%
Fund FamilyBNY Mellon Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
InceptionApr 22, 2020Sep 7, 2010

BKAG vs VOO Performance

BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF (BKAG) is a ETF from BNY Mellon Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BKAG returned +2.10% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, BKAG is down 0.41% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, BKAG compounded at +3.98% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -0.52% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs -0.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 5.8% for BKAG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for BKAG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

BKAG charges 0.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $0 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BKAG currently yields 4.22% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

0.0%overlap

BKAG and VOO share 4 holdings out of 4934 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in BKAGWeight in VOODifference
LRCX0.02%0.84%0.82%
DUK0.00%0.15%0.15%
MMC 4.75 03/15/390.00%0.12%0.12%
KDPProProPro
See all 4 holdings BKAG shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, BKAG or VOO?

BKAG has an expense ratio of 0.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. BKAG is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.

Which performed better, BKAG or VOO?

Over the past year BKAG returned +2.10% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), BKAG annualized -0.30% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, BKAG or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 5.8% for BKAG. Worst drawdown: BKAG -19.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both BKAG and VOO?

BKAG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between BKAG and VOO?

BKAG and VOO share 4 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4934 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, BKAG or VOO?

BKAG yields 4.22% while VOO yields 1.09%, so BKAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →