BGX vs VYM
BGX vs VYM
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGX | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.77% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $155M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.01% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 592 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -2.82% | +15.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.72% | +25.56% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.14% | +17.86% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.78% | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | The Blackstone Group Inc | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Nov 10, 2006 |
BGX vs VYM Performance
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is a ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BGX returned -5.72% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, BGX is down 2.82% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.
Over three years, BGX compounded at +7.14% per year against +17.86% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +2.78% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs -0.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 12.9% for BGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.0% for BGX and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGX charges 2.77% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $277 vs $4 annually, a gap of $273 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGX currently yields 8.01% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
BGX and VYM share 0 holdings out of 882 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGX or VYM?
BGX has an expense ratio of 2.77% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $273 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGX or VYM?
Over the past year BGX returned -5.72% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BGX annualized -0.87% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGX or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 12.9% for BGX. Worst drawdown: BGX -58.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both BGX and VYM?
BGX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGX and VYM?
BGX and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 882 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGX or VYM?
BGX yields 8.01% while VYM yields 2.86%, so BGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.