BGX vs QQQ
BGX vs QQQ
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. BGX offers more diversification with 324 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BGX | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 2.77% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $155M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.01% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 592 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -2.46% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | -5.37% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.28% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.99% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | The Blackstone Group Inc | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 27, 2011 | Mar 10, 1999 |
BGX vs QQQ Performance
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) is a ETF from The Blackstone Group Inc and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year BGX returned -5.37% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, BGX is down 2.46% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, BGX compounded at +7.28% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +2.99% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs -0.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 12.9% for BGX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.0% for BGX and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BGX charges 2.77% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $277 vs $18 annually, a gap of $259 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BGX currently yields 8.01% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
BGX and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 427 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BGX or QQQ?
BGX has an expense ratio of 2.77% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $259 per year of difference.
Which performed better, BGX or QQQ?
Over the past year BGX returned -5.37% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), BGX annualized -0.84% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, BGX or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 12.9% for BGX. Worst drawdown: BGX -58.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both BGX and QQQ?
BGX and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between BGX and QQQ?
BGX and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 427 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, BGX or QQQ?
BGX yields 8.01% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so BGX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.