AKAF vs VTI

Quick Verdict

VTI has a lower expense ratio. AKAF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: AKAFMore Diversified: VTI

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAKAFVTIWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.03%
AUM$3M$663.5B
Dividend Yield3.02%1.07%
Holdings1373,543
YTD Return+12.94%+13.57%
1Y Return+29.56%+24.23%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.73%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.24%
Volatility (annualized)12.9%15.3%
Max Drawdown-9.3%-56.6%
Fund FamilyFrontier Economic FundVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJun 25, 2025May 24, 2001

AKAF vs VTI Performance

The Frontier Economic Fund ETF (AKAF) is a ETF from Frontier Economic Fund and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AKAF returned +29.56% while VTI returned +24.23%. Year to date, AKAF is up 12.94% versus a gain of 13.57% for VTI.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 12.9% for AKAF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.3% for AKAF and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AKAF charges 0.20% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AKAF currently yields 3.02% against 1.07% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

12.4%overlap

AKAF and VTI share 93 holdings out of 2829 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.4% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AKAFWeight in VTIDifference
AAPL0.84%5.84%5.00%
MSFT0.69%3.81%3.12%
AMZN0.79%3.17%2.38%
GOOGLProProPro
XOMProProPro
COPProProPro
UBERProProPro
DASHProProPro
UPSProProPro
SLBProProPro
See all 10 holdings AKAF shares with VTI
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AKAF or VTI?

AKAF has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AKAF or VTI?

Over the past year AKAF returned +29.56% vs +24.23% for VTI, so AKAF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), AKAF annualized +29.30% vs +8.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AKAF or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 12.9% for AKAF. Worst drawdown: AKAF -9.3% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both AKAF and VTI?

AKAF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between AKAF and VTI?

AKAF and VTI share 93 common holdings with a 12.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2829 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AKAF or VTI?

AKAF yields 3.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so AKAF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →