AFLG vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAFLGVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.55%0.04%
AUM$702M$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.70%2.86%
Holdings219568
YTD Return+15.26%+15.57%
1Y Return+23.44%+25.99%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.63%+18.02%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.86%+12.71%
Volatility (annualized)16.8%14.6%
Max Drawdown-35.8%-58.8%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 4, 2019Nov 10, 2006

AFLG vs VYM Performance

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AFLG returned +23.44% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, AFLG is up 15.26% versus a gain of 15.57% for VYM.

Over three years, AFLG compounded at +21.63% per year against +18.02% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.86% and +12.71% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AFLG has the edge at +14.00% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for AFLG and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AFLG charges 0.55% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $4 annually, a gap of $51 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFLG currently yields 0.70% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

22.8%overlap

AFLG and VYM share 96 holdings out of 677 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AFLGWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.69%6.47%3.78%
XOM1.01%2.83%1.82%
JNJ0.62%2.62%2.00%
CSCOProProPro
ABBVProProPro
CATProProPro
CVXProProPro
MRKProProPro
UNHProProPro
MOProProPro
See all 10 holdings AFLG shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AFLG or VYM?

AFLG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $51 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AFLG or VYM?

Over the past year AFLG returned +23.44% vs +25.99% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AFLG annualized +14.00% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AFLG or VYM?

AFLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: AFLG -35.8% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both AFLG and VYM?

AFLG and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between AFLG and VYM?

AFLG and VYM share 96 common holdings with a 22.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 677 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AFLG or VYM?

AFLG yields 0.70% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →