AFLG vs SPY

Quick Verdict

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPYMore Diversified: SPY

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricAFLGSPYWinner
Expense Ratio0.55%0.09%
AUM$702M$789.1B
Dividend Yield0.70%1.01%
Holdings219505
YTD Return+15.26%+13.50%
1Y Return+23.44%+23.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.63%+21.17%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.86%+13.46%
Volatility (annualized)16.8%15.3%
Max Drawdown-35.8%-56.5%
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionDec 4, 2019Jan 22, 1993

AFLG vs SPY Performance

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF (AFLG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year AFLG returned +23.44% while SPY returned +23.56%. Year to date, AFLG is up 15.26% versus a gain of 13.50% for SPY.

Over three years, AFLG compounded at +21.63% per year against +21.17% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.86% and +13.46% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AFLG has the edge at +14.00% annualized vs +8.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

AFLG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.8% compared with 15.3% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.8% for AFLG and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.98. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

AFLG charges 0.55% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $9 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AFLG currently yields 0.70% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

47.9%overlap

AFLG and SPY share 180 holdings out of 538 unique holdings combined, representing a 47.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in AFLGWeight in SPYDifference
NVDA7.57%7.31%0.26%
AAPL6.83%7.09%0.26%
GOOGL5.51%3.32%2.19%
MSFTProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
LRCXProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings AFLG shares with SPY
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, AFLG or SPY?

AFLG has an expense ratio of 0.55% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, AFLG or SPY?

Over the past year AFLG returned +23.44% vs +23.56% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AFLG annualized +14.00% vs +8.85% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, AFLG or SPY?

AFLG has been the more volatile fund at 16.8% annualized versus 15.3% for SPY. Worst drawdown: AFLG -35.8% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both AFLG and SPY?

AFLG and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.98, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between AFLG and SPY?

AFLG and SPY share 180 common holdings with a 47.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 538 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, AFLG or SPY?

AFLG yields 0.70% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →