ABI vs IVV
ABI vs IVV
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ABI | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $56M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.61% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 99 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +3.33% | +9.93% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.21% | +19.59% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.41% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -0.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Victory Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
ABI vs IVV Performance
VictoryShares Pioneer Asset-Based Income ETF (ABI) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ABI returned +5.21% while IVV returned +19.59%. Year to date, ABI is up 3.33% versus a gain of 9.93% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 1.5% for ABI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -0.9% for ABI and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.29. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ABI charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ABI currently yields 3.61% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ABI and IVV share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ABI or IVV?
ABI has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ABI or IVV?
Over the past year ABI returned +5.21% vs +19.59% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ABI annualized +5.09% vs +6.91% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ABI or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 1.5% for ABI. Worst drawdown: ABI -0.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ABI and IVV?
ABI and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.29, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ABI and IVV?
ABI and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ABI or IVV?
ABI yields 3.61% while IVV yields 1.09%, so ABI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.