VCR vs VOO
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, VCR or VOO?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VCR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VCR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $6.6B | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 356 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -2.55% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | -3.01% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.67% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.51% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.9% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.2% | -34.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,468 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.7% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2004 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 11, 2026 (16 years).
VCR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.
VCR vs VOO Performance
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VCR returned -3.01% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, VCR is down 2.55% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Over three years, VCR compounded at +10.67% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.51% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VCR has the edge at +13.73% annualized vs +13.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.2% for VCR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VCR charges 0.09% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $3 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VCR currently yields 0.73% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
76.0% of VCR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.3% of VOO's money is in holdings VCR also owns.
Most of VCR is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
48 positions in common, counted across the 278 positions we hold weights for in VCR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 356 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 449 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for VCR (90.1% of the fund), and 226 for VCR that do not appear in VOO (23.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VCR | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 19.73% | 3.62% | 16.11% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 17.26% | 1.84% | 15.42% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 5.13% | 0.54% | 4.59% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 2.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 2.49% | 0.26% | 2.23% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.13% | 0.21% | 1.92% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.83% | 0.19% | 1.64% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 1.74% | 0.18% | 1.56% |
| MARMarriott International, Inc. | 1.28% | 0.13% | 1.15% |
| RCLRoyal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. | 1.25% | 0.12% | 1.13% |
76.0% of VCR is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VCR or VOO?
VCR has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VCR or VOO?
Over the past year VCR returned -3.01% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VCR annualized +13.73% vs +13.41% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VCR or VOO?
VCR has been the more volatile fund at 18.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VCR -39.2% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both VCR and VOO?
VCR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VCR and VOO?
76.0% of VCR's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.3% of VOO's is in holdings VCR also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 278 positions we hold weights for in VCR and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, VCR or VOO?
VCR yields 0.73% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than VCR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VCR led over the full window, VOO over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.