SHRT vs VTI
Gotham Short Strategies ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SHRT or VTI?
Opposite sides of the same exposure.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.57, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. SHRT is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SHRT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $13M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 625 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -11.72% | +14.72%Best |
| 1Y Return | -9.27% | +16.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.88% | +22.93%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.9% | 11.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $8,133 | $18,383Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.2%Best | 33.3% |
| Fund Family | Gotham ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 6, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 6, 2023 to Oct 6, 2026 (2.9 years).
SHRT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.9 years both funds cover.
SHRT vs VTI Performance
Gotham Short Strategies ETF (SHRT) is an ETF from Gotham ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SHRT returned -9.27% while VTI returned +16.82%. Year to date, SHRT is down 11.72% versus a gain of 14.72% for VTI.
Over three years, SHRT compounded at -6.88% per year against +22.93% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SHRT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 11.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.8% for SHRT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.57. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SHRT charges 1.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $135 vs $3 annually, a gap of $132 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SHRT currently yields 0.08% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
77.1% of SHRT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 38.4% of VTI's money is in holdings SHRT also owns.
They hold the same names on opposite sides, so owning both offsets the exposure rather than doubling it.
The two holdings books were reported 47 days apart, SHRT as of Sep 16, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
318 positions in common, counted across the 372 positions we hold weights for in SHRT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 625 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 852 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SHRT (59.2% of the fund), and 10 for SHRT that do not appear in VTI (15.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SHRT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | -1.59% | 6.29% | 7.88% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | -0.72% | 4.79% | 5.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | -1.32% | 3.65% | 4.97% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 0.96% | 1.35% | 0.39% |
| OVVOvintiv Inc. | 2.14% | 0.02% | 2.12% |
| DDDupont De Nemou | 1.98% | 0.03% | 1.95% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.20% |
| LMTLockheed Martin Corp | 1.74% | 0.19% | 1.55% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.67% | 0.09% | 1.58% |
| OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp. | 1.68% | 0.06% | 1.62% |
77.1% of SHRT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SHRT or VTI?
SHRT has an expense ratio of 1.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $132 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SHRT or VTI?
Over the past year SHRT returned -9.27% vs +16.82% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SHRT or VTI?
SHRT has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 11.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SHRT -27.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both SHRT and VTI?
SHRT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.57, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SHRT and VTI?
77.1% of SHRT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 38.4% of VTI's is in holdings SHRT also owns. They hold 318 positions in common, counted across the 372 positions we hold weights for in SHRT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SHRT or VTI?
SHRT yields 0.08% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SHRT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.57, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. SHRT is less concentrated, with 27.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.