IVV vs RSPA
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF
Which is better, IVV or RSPA?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | RSPA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.29% |
| AUM | $882.6B | $1.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 8.95% |
| Holdings | 508 | 525 |
| YTD Return | +14.21%Best | +10.11% |
| 1Y Return | +16.27%Best | +12.34% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.01% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.64% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.9% | 9.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -15.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.2 years | $14,219Best | $12,683 |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jul 17, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 17, 2024 to Oct 8, 2026 (2.2 years).
IVV vs RSPA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.2 years both funds cover.
IVV vs RSPA Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Income Advantage ETF (RSPA) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IVV returned +16.27% while RSPA returned +12.34%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.21% versus a gain of 10.11% for RSPA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.9% compared with 9.1% for RSPA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for IVV and -15.4% for RSPA. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while RSPA charges 0.29%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $29 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 8.95% for RSPA.
Holdings Overlap
At least 99.0% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPA also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RSPA, our book for it covers 94.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of IVV is already inside RSPA. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
496 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 505 in RSPA, against full books of 508 and 525.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in RSPA | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.00% | 0.16% | 7.84% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.39% | 0.16% | 7.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 0.18% | 5.39% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.80% | 0.15% | 3.65% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 3.00% | 0.08% | 2.92% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.59% | 0.14% | 2.45% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.40% | 0.06% | 2.34% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.15% | 0.16% | 1.99% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.44% | 0.41% | 1.03% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.66% | 0.16% | 1.50% |
99.0% of IVV is already inside RSPA.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or RSPA?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while RSPA charges 0.29%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or RSPA?
Over the past year IVV returned +16.27% vs +12.34% for RSPA, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +17.35% vs +11.41% for RSPA. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IVV or RSPA?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 11.9% annualized versus 9.1% for RSPA. Worst drawdown: IVV -18.8% vs RSPA -15.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and RSPA?
IVV and RSPA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and RSPA?
At least 99.0% of IVV's money is in holdings RSPA also owns. Our book for RSPA is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 496 positions in common, counted across the 505 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 505 in RSPA.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or RSPA?
IVV yields 1.06% while RSPA yields 8.95%, so RSPA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RSPA better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.