FEMV vs VOO

FEMV vs VOO

Which is better, FEMV or VOO?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEMV is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: FEMV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricFEMVVOO
Expense Ratio0.23%0.03%Best
AUM$7M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.25%1.04%
Holdings245509
YTD Return+7.84%+11.55%Best
1Y Return-+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.71%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Top 10 Weight10.3%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyFidelity Investments (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

FEMV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

FEMV vs VOO Performance

Fidelity Enhanced Mid Cap Value ETF (FEMV) is an ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, FEMV is up 7.84% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

FEMV charges 0.23% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $23 vs $3 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FEMV currently yields 0.25% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

FEMV already in VOO58.4%
VOO already in FEMV6.9%

58.4% of FEMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.9% of VOO's money is in holdings FEMV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

125 positions in common, counted across the 243 positions we hold weights for in FEMV and 505 in VOO, against full books of 245 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 372 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for FEMV (92.6% of the fund), and 107 for FEMV that do not appear in VOO (37.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in FEMVWeight in VOODifference
NUENucor Corp.1.12%0.08%1.04%
AMEAmetek Inc.1.01%0.09%0.92%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.1.01%0.09%0.92%
ALLAllstate Corp.1.00%0.09%0.91%
KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de0.98%0.10%0.88%
STTState Street Corp.1.00%0.07%0.93%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp.0.90%0.12%0.78%
WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp.0.94%0.07%0.87%
VTRVentas, Inc.0.92%0.07%0.85%
FFord Motor Co.0.91%0.08%0.83%

58.4% of FEMV is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

FEMVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, FEMV or VOO?

FEMV has an expense ratio of 0.23% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between FEMV and VOO?

58.4% of FEMV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.9% of VOO's is in holdings FEMV also owns. They hold 125 positions in common, counted across the 243 positions we hold weights for in FEMV and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, FEMV or VOO?

FEMV yields 0.25% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than FEMV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. FEMV is less concentrated, with 10.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.