VGT vs XLK

Quick Verdict

XLK has a lower expense ratio. XLK delivered stronger 1-year returns. VGT offers more diversification with 322 holdings.

Lower Fees: XLKHigher Returns: XLKMore Diversified: VGT

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGTXLKWinner
Expense Ratio0.09%0.08%
AUM$146.6B$114.1B
Dividend Yield0.38%0.42%
Holdings32476
YTD Return+26.85%+28.75%
1Y Return+38.91%+41.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+30.70%+30.14%
5Y Return (annualized)+18.88%+19.97%
Volatility (annualized)19.5%23.2%
Max Drawdown-54.8%-82.0%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 26, 2004Dec 16, 1998

VGT vs XLK Performance

Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VGT returned +38.91% while XLK returned +41.65%. Year to date, VGT is up 26.85% versus a gain of 28.75% for XLK.

Over three years, VGT compounded at +30.70% per year against +30.14% for XLK; over five years the annualized figures are +18.88% and +19.97% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VGT has the edge at +14.29% annualized vs +9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XLK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.2% compared with 19.5% for VGT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.8% for VGT and -82.0% for XLK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGT charges 0.09% per year while XLK charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $8 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGT currently yields 0.38% against 0.42% for XLK.

Holdings Overlap

80.0%overlap

VGT and XLK share 73 holdings out of 324 unique holdings combined, representing a 80.0% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VGTWeight in XLKDifference
NVDA16.09%12.84%3.25%
AAPL14.32%12.45%1.87%
MSFT8.28%7.79%0.49%
MUProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMDProProPro
INTCProProPro
AMATProProPro
LRCXProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings VGT shares with XLK
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGT or XLK?

VGT has an expense ratio of 0.09% while XLK charges 0.08%. XLK is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, VGT or XLK?

Over the past year VGT returned +38.91% vs +41.65% for XLK, so XLK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VGT annualized +14.29% vs +9.43% for XLK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, VGT or XLK?

XLK has been the more volatile fund at 23.2% annualized versus 19.5% for VGT. Worst drawdown: VGT -54.8% vs XLK -82.0%.

Should I hold both VGT and XLK?

VGT and XLK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between VGT and XLK?

VGT and XLK share 73 common holdings with a 80.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 324 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGT or XLK?

VGT yields 0.38% while XLK yields 0.42%, so XLK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →