SMRF vs VOO

SMRF vs VOO

Which is better, SMRF or VOO?

VOO costs less.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSMRFVOO
Expense Ratio0.65%0.03%Best
AUM$13M$1.0T
Dividend Yield1.81%1.05%
Holdings86519
YTD Return-28.64%+11.31%Best
1Y Return-+13.49%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.46%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.61%
Top 10 Weight40.1%39.1%Best
Fund FamilyALPS AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionFeb 18, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SMRF vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SMRF vs VOO Performance

ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMRF is down 28.64% versus a gain of 11.31% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SMRF charges 0.65% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMRF currently yields 1.81% against 1.05% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

SMRF already in VOO30.2%
VOO already in SMRF5.7%

30.2% of SMRF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.7% of VOO's money is in holdings SMRF also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 506 in VOO, against full books of 86 and 519.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 484 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for SMRF (94.3% of the fund), and 30 for SMRF that do not appear in VOO (33.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SMRFWeight in VOODifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.63%1.83%0.20%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.1.52%1.52%0.00%
DUKDuke Energy Corp.2.63%0.13%2.50%
DDominion Energy Inc.2.58%0.08%2.50%
GEVGe Vernova2.23%0.38%1.85%
CEGConstellation Energy Corp2.24%0.13%2.11%
ETREntergy Corp.2.28%0.07%2.21%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.2.04%0.07%1.97%
VRTVertiv Group Corp1.90%0.14%1.76%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.1.73%0.25%1.48%

30.2% of SMRF is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SMRFVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SMRF or VOO?

SMRF has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SMRF and VOO?

30.2% of SMRF's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 5.7% of VOO's is in holdings SMRF also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in SMRF and 506 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, SMRF or VOO?

SMRF yields 1.81% while VOO yields 1.05%, so SMRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than SMRF?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO is less concentrated, with 39.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.