IVV vs SMRF

IVV vs SMRF

Which is better, IVV or SMRF?

IVV costs less.

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%.

Lower Fees: IVVLess Concentrated: IVV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSMRF
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.65%
AUM$879.1B$13M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.81%
Holdings50986
YTD Return+11.33%Best-28.64%
1Y Return+13.50%-
3Y Return (annualized)+20.45%-
5Y Return (annualized)+11.61%-
Top 10 Weight37.3%Best40.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ALPS Advisors
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 15, 2000Feb 18, 2026

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

IVV vs SMRF growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

IVV vs SMRF Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ALPS Nautilus SMR, Nuclear & Technology ETF (SMRF) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors. Year to date, IVV is up 11.33% versus a loss of 28.64% for SMRF.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMRF charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $65 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.81% for SMRF.

Holdings Overlap

IVV already in SMRF4.8%
SMRF already in IVV30.2%

4.8% of IVV's money is in holdings SMRF also owns. 30.2% of SMRF's money is in holdings IVV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 81 in SMRF, against full books of 509 and 86.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 30 positions for SMRF that do not appear in our book for IVV (33.3% of the fund), and 468 for IVV that do not appear in SMRF (94.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SMRFDifference
MUMicron Technology, Inc.1.53%1.63%0.10%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc.1.26%1.52%0.26%
DUKDuke Energy Corp.0.15%2.63%2.48%
DDominion Energy Inc.0.09%2.58%2.49%
GEVGe Vernova0.35%2.23%1.88%
CEGConstellation Energy Corp0.13%2.24%2.11%
ETREntergy Corp.0.08%2.28%2.20%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.0.07%2.04%1.97%
VRTVertiv Group Corp0.14%1.90%1.76%
WDCWestern Digital Corp.0.20%1.73%1.53%

30.2% of SMRF is already inside IVV.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

IVVSMRF

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SMRF?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMRF charges 0.65%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMRF?

30.2% of SMRF's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 30.2% of SMRF's is in holdings IVV also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 81 in SMRF.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMRF?

IVV yields 1.09% while SMRF yields 1.81%, so SMRF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SMRF better than IVV?

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.