SCHX vs SPY

Quick Verdict

SCHX has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHX offers more diversification with 750 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHXHigher Returns: SPYMore Diversified: SCHX

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSCHXSPYWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.09%
AUM$71.1B$789.1B
Dividend Yield1.03%1.01%
Holdings750505
YTD Return+12.96%+13.10%
1Y Return+22.28%+22.80%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.96%+20.98%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.62%+13.20%
Volatility (annualized)14.5%15.3%
Max Drawdown-34.3%-56.5%
Fund FamilyCharles Schwab Asset ManagementState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 3, 2009Jan 22, 1993

SCHX vs SPY Performance

Schwab US Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year SCHX returned +22.28% while SPY returned +22.80%. Year to date, SCHX is up 12.96% versus a gain of 13.10% for SPY.

Over three years, SCHX compounded at +20.96% per year against +20.98% for SPY; over five years the annualized figures are +12.62% and +13.20% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, SCHX has the edge at +13.20% annualized vs +8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 14.5% for SCHX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for SCHX and -56.5% for SPY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SCHX charges 0.03% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHX currently yields 1.03% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

91.7%overlap

SCHX and SPY share 490 holdings out of 763 unique holdings combined, representing a 91.7% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SCHXWeight in SPYDifference
NVDA7.48%7.31%0.17%
AAPL7.30%7.09%0.21%
MSFT4.23%4.43%0.20%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
MUProProPro
TSLAProProPro
See all 10 holdings SCHX shares with SPY
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SCHX or SPY?

SCHX has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPY charges 0.09%. SCHX is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, SCHX or SPY?

Over the past year SCHX returned +22.28% vs +22.80% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SCHX annualized +13.20% vs +8.83% for SPY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, SCHX or SPY?

SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 14.5% for SCHX. Worst drawdown: SCHX -34.3% vs SPY -56.5%.

Should I hold both SCHX and SPY?

SCHX and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between SCHX and SPY?

SCHX and SPY share 490 common holdings with a 91.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 763 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, SCHX or SPY?

SCHX yields 1.03% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SCHX currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →