SCHD vs TRPA
SCHD vs TRPA
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF vs Hartford AAA CLO ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SCHD | TRPA | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.24% | |
| AUM | $103.7B | $111M | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.31% | 5.07% | |
| Holdings | 104 | 123 | |
| YTD Return | +23.53% | -0.21% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.95% | +1.58% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.72% | +5.01% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.56% | +2.77% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.6% | 3.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.4% | -10.8% | |
| Fund Family | Charles Schwab Asset Management | Hartford Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | Oct 20, 2011 | May 30, 2018 |
SCHD vs TRPA Performance
Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management and Hartford AAA CLO ETF (TRPA) is a ETF from Hartford Funds. Over the past year SCHD returned +30.95% while TRPA returned +1.58%. Year to date, SCHD is up 23.53% versus a loss of 0.21% for TRPA.
Over three years, SCHD compounded at +14.72% per year against +5.01% for TRPA; over five years the annualized figures are +9.56% and +2.77% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.35% annualized vs +3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 3.5% for TRPA. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.4% for SCHD and -10.8% for TRPA. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SCHD charges 0.06% per year while TRPA charges 0.24%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $24 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SCHD currently yields 3.31% against 5.07% for TRPA.
Holdings Overlap
SCHD and TRPA share 0 holdings out of 111 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SCHD or TRPA?
SCHD has an expense ratio of 0.06% while TRPA charges 0.24%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $18 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SCHD or TRPA?
Over the past year SCHD returned +30.95% vs +1.58% for TRPA, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), SCHD annualized +11.35% vs +3.13% for TRPA. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SCHD or TRPA?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 3.5% for TRPA. Worst drawdown: SCHD -33.4% vs TRPA -10.8%.
Should I hold both SCHD and TRPA?
SCHD and TRPA have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SCHD and TRPA?
SCHD and TRPA share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 111 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SCHD or TRPA?
SCHD yields 3.31% while TRPA yields 5.07%, so TRPA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.