RFG vs SCHD
RFG vs SCHD
Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RFG | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $345M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.14% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 98 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +18.13% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.41% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.52% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.35% | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -52.0% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 1, 2006 | Oct 20, 2011 |
RFG vs SCHD Performance
Invesco S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year RFG returned +27.41% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, RFG is up 18.13% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, RFG compounded at +16.52% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +7.35% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RFG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -52.0% for RFG and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RFG charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RFG currently yields 0.14% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
RFG and SCHD share 1 holdings out of 198 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RFG | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FHI | 0.77% | 0.11% | 0.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RFG or SCHD?
RFG has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, RFG or SCHD?
Over the past year RFG returned +27.41% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), RFG annualized +9.48% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, RFG or SCHD?
RFG has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: RFG -52.0% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both RFG and SCHD?
RFG and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between RFG and SCHD?
RFG and SCHD share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 198 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, RFG or SCHD?
RFG yields 0.14% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.