QDPL vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricQDPLVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.60%0.04%
AUM$1.7B$79.0B
Dividend Yield4.56%2.86%
Holdings521568
YTD Return+12.27%+15.80%
1Y Return+22.01%+26.12%
3Y Return (annualized)+19.87%+18.25%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.37%+12.51%
Volatility (annualized)14.0%14.6%
Max Drawdown-22.6%-58.8%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJul 12, 2021Nov 10, 2006

QDPL vs VYM Performance

Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QDPL returned +22.01% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, QDPL is up 12.27% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.

Over three years, QDPL compounded at +19.87% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.37% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QDPL has the edge at +12.47% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 14.0% for QDPL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.6% for QDPL and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

QDPL charges 0.60% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $4 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QDPL currently yields 4.56% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

29.8%overlap

QDPL and VYM share 221 holdings out of 839 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in QDPLWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.41%6.47%4.06%
JPM:US1.26%3.36%2.10%
XOM0.80%2.83%2.03%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CATProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings QDPL shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, QDPL or VYM?

QDPL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.

Which performed better, QDPL or VYM?

Over the past year QDPL returned +22.01% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), QDPL annualized +12.47% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, QDPL or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 14.0% for QDPL. Worst drawdown: QDPL -22.6% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both QDPL and VYM?

QDPL and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between QDPL and VYM?

QDPL and VYM share 221 common holdings with a 29.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 839 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, QDPL or VYM?

QDPL yields 4.56% while VYM yields 2.86%, so QDPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →