PWS vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. PWS offers more diversification with 329 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDMore Diversified: PWS

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricPWSSCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.60%0.06%
AUM$24M$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.29%3.31%
Holdings235104
YTD Return+0.88%+24.08%
1Y Return+5.57%+31.88%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.84%+14.92%
5Y Return (annualized)+1.78%+9.85%
Volatility (annualized)12.5%13.6%
Max Drawdown-24.9%-33.4%
Fund FamilyPacer ETFsCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryAllocation/BalancedEquity
InceptionDec 11, 2017Oct 20, 2011

PWS vs SCHD Performance

Pacer WealthShield ETF (PWS) is a ETF from Pacer ETFs and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year PWS returned +5.57% while SCHD returned +31.88%. Year to date, PWS is up 0.88% versus a gain of 24.08% for SCHD.

Over three years, PWS compounded at +6.84% per year against +14.92% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +1.78% and +9.85% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.6% compared with 12.5% for PWS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.9% for PWS and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

PWS charges 0.60% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $6 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PWS currently yields 1.29% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

2.2%overlap

PWS and SCHD share 12 holdings out of 417 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in PWSWeight in SCHDDifference
AMGN0.21%4.25%4.04%
TXN0.23%3.70%3.47%
LMT0.39%2.66%2.27%
QCOMProProPro
ADPProProPro
UPSProProPro
2345:TWProProPro
FASTProProPro
PAYXProProPro
SNAProProPro
See all 10 holdings PWS shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, PWS or SCHD?

PWS has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.

Which performed better, PWS or SCHD?

Over the past year PWS returned +5.57% vs +31.88% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), PWS annualized +4.43% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, PWS or SCHD?

SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.6% annualized versus 12.5% for PWS. Worst drawdown: PWS -24.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both PWS and SCHD?

PWS and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between PWS and SCHD?

PWS and SCHD share 12 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 417 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, PWS or SCHD?

PWS yields 1.29% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →