PSF vs VXUS
PSF vs VXUS
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund Inc. vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PSF | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.59% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2,687.94 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.91% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 332 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +0.05% | +11.69% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.96% | +26.65% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.11% | +18.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.67% | +8.66% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.6% | 15.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -55.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Cohen & Steers Funds | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 24, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
PSF vs VXUS Performance
Cohen & Steers Select Preferred and Income Fund Inc. (PSF) is a ETF from Cohen & Steers Funds and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PSF returned +1.96% while VXUS returned +26.65%. Year to date, PSF is up 0.05% versus a gain of 11.69% for VXUS.
Over three years, PSF compounded at +9.11% per year against +18.15% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -1.67% and +8.66% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.69% annualized vs +1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PSF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.6% compared with 15.0% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -55.4% for PSF and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.57. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PSF charges 1.59% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $159 vs $5 annually, a gap of $154 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PSF currently yields 6.91% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
PSF and VXUS share 1 holdings out of 8046 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PSF | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSBA:LN | 0.08% | 0.72% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PSF or VXUS?
PSF has an expense ratio of 1.59% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $154 per year of difference.
Which performed better, PSF or VXUS?
Over the past year PSF returned +1.96% vs +26.65% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), PSF annualized +1.18% vs +4.69% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, PSF or VXUS?
PSF has been the more volatile fund at 16.6% annualized versus 15.0% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: PSF -55.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both PSF and VXUS?
PSF and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.57, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between PSF and VXUS?
PSF and VXUS share 1 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8046 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, PSF or VXUS?
PSF yields 6.91% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so PSF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.