MOAT vs VXUS
MOAT vs VXUS
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MOAT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.46% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $11.7B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.35% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 59 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +7.53% | +13.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.98% | +28.53% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.77% | +18.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.01% | +9.00% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 154573.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -96.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 24, 2012 | Jan 26, 2011 |
MOAT vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MOAT returned +14.98% while VXUS returned +28.53%. Year to date, MOAT is up 7.53% versus a gain of 13.65% for VXUS.
Over three years, MOAT compounded at +11.77% per year against +18.64% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +9.01% and +9.00% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, MOAT has the edge at +52.38% annualized vs +4.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MOAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 154573.1% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -96.0% for MOAT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MOAT charges 0.46% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $46 vs $5 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MOAT currently yields 1.35% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
MOAT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7915 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MOAT or VXUS?
MOAT has an expense ratio of 0.46% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $41 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MOAT or VXUS?
Over the past year MOAT returned +14.98% vs +28.53% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MOAT annualized +52.38% vs +4.81% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MOAT or VXUS?
MOAT has been the more volatile fund at 154573.1% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: MOAT -96.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both MOAT and VXUS?
MOAT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MOAT and VXUS?
MOAT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7915 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MOAT or VXUS?
MOAT yields 1.35% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.