MINT vs VYM
MINT vs VYM
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. MINT offers more diversification with 766 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $16.9B | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 1,023 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +2.22% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.17% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.12% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.56% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.8% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2009 | Nov 10, 2006 |
MINT vs VYM Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINT returned +4.17% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, MINT is up 2.22% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, MINT compounded at +5.12% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +3.56% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 1.2% for MINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.8% for MINT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.36. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINT charges 0.36% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $4 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINT currently yields 4.35% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
MINT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 1324 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINT or VYM?
MINT has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINT or VYM?
Over the past year MINT returned +4.17% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), MINT annualized +1.18% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINT or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 1.2% for MINT. Worst drawdown: MINT -4.8% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both MINT and VYM?
MINT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.36, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINT and VYM?
MINT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1324 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINT or VYM?
MINT yields 4.35% while VYM yields 2.86%, so MINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.