MINT vs VOO
MINT vs VOO
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. MINT offers more diversification with 766 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MINT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.36% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $16.9B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.35% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 1,023 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +2.20% | +13.11% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.17% | +22.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.13% | +21.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +3.55% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.2% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -4.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | PIMCO (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 16, 2009 | Sep 7, 2010 |
MINT vs VOO Performance
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exchange-Traded Fund (MINT) is a ETF from PIMCO (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year MINT returned +4.17% while VOO returned +22.88%. Year to date, MINT is up 2.20% versus a gain of 13.11% for VOO.
Over three years, MINT compounded at +5.13% per year against +21.08% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +3.55% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.54% annualized vs +1.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 1.2% for MINT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.8% for MINT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.42. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MINT charges 0.36% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $36 vs $3 annually, a gap of $33 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MINT currently yields 4.35% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
MINT and VOO share 0 holdings out of 1271 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MINT or VOO?
MINT has an expense ratio of 0.36% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $33 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MINT or VOO?
Over the past year MINT returned +4.17% vs +22.88% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), MINT annualized +1.18% vs +13.54% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MINT or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 1.2% for MINT. Worst drawdown: MINT -4.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both MINT and VOO?
MINT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.42, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MINT and VOO?
MINT and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1271 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MINT or VOO?
MINT yields 4.35% while VOO yields 1.09%, so MINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.