MIDE vs QQQ
MIDE vs QQQ
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
MIDE has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. MIDE offers more diversification with 270 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MIDE | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $3M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.25% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 282 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.08% | +17.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.72% | +28.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.18% | +24.88% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.02% | +14.86% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -24.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
MIDE vs QQQ Performance
Xtrackers S&P MidCap 400 Scored & Screened ETF (MIDE) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year MIDE returned +26.72% while QQQ returned +28.64%. Year to date, MIDE is up 16.08% versus a gain of 17.27% for QQQ.
Over three years, MIDE compounded at +14.18% per year against +24.88% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +9.02% and +14.86% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +9.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.9% for MIDE. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.6% for MIDE and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MIDE charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MIDE currently yields 1.25% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
MIDE and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 373 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MIDE or QQQ?
MIDE has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. MIDE is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, MIDE or QQQ?
Over the past year MIDE returned +26.72% vs +28.64% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), MIDE annualized +9.43% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, MIDE or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.9% for MIDE. Worst drawdown: MIDE -24.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both MIDE and QQQ?
MIDE and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between MIDE and QQQ?
MIDE and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 373 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, MIDE or QQQ?
MIDE yields 1.25% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so MIDE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.