MAGA vs SCHD

Quick Verdict

SCHD has a lower expense ratio. SCHD delivered stronger 1-year returns. MAGA offers more diversification with 150 holdings.

Lower Fees: SCHDHigher Returns: SCHDMore Diversified: MAGA

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricMAGASCHDWinner
Expense Ratio0.72%0.06%
AUM$31M$103.7B
Dividend Yield1.48%3.31%
Holdings151104
YTD Return+10.82%+24.26%
1Y Return+14.13%+31.38%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.88%+15.08%
5Y Return (annualized)+11.04%+9.72%
Volatility (annualized)19.1%13.6%
Max Drawdown-43.2%-33.4%
Fund FamilyTruth Social FundsCharles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionSep 6, 2017Oct 20, 2011

MAGA vs SCHD Performance

Truth Social America First ETF (MAGA) is a ETF from Truth Social Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year MAGA returned +14.13% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, MAGA is up 10.82% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.

Over three years, MAGA compounded at +13.88% per year against +15.08% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +11.04% and +9.72% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, MAGA has the edge at +11.47% annualized vs +11.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

MAGA has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.1% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.2% for MAGA and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

MAGA charges 0.72% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $72 vs $6 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAGA currently yields 1.48% against 3.31% for SCHD.

Holdings Overlap

12.9%overlap

MAGA and SCHD share 19 holdings out of 231 unique holdings combined, representing a 12.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in MAGAWeight in SCHDDifference
ABT0.67%4.49%3.82%
AMGN0.68%4.25%3.57%
HD0.65%4.16%3.51%
CVXProProPro
COPProProPro
BMYProProPro
MOProProPro
BXProProPro
UPSProProPro
EOGProProPro
See all 10 holdings MAGA shares with SCHD
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, MAGA or SCHD?

MAGA has an expense ratio of 0.72% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $66 per year of difference.

Which performed better, MAGA or SCHD?

Over the past year MAGA returned +14.13% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so SCHD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), MAGA annualized +11.47% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, MAGA or SCHD?

MAGA has been the more volatile fund at 19.1% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: MAGA -43.2% vs SCHD -33.4%.

Should I hold both MAGA and SCHD?

MAGA and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between MAGA and SCHD?

MAGA and SCHD share 19 common holdings with a 12.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 231 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, MAGA or SCHD?

MAGA yields 1.48% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →