LQDI vs VYM
LQDI vs VYM
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LQDI | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $69M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.60% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 128 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -2.20% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.91% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +3.97% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.42% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -29.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | May 8, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
LQDI vs VYM Performance
iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDI) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LQDI returned -0.91% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, LQDI is down 2.20% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, LQDI compounded at +3.97% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +0.42% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs +3.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 9.1% for LQDI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -29.0% for LQDI and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LQDI charges 0.18% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $4 annually, a gap of $14 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LQDI currently yields 4.60% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
LQDI and VYM share 0 holdings out of 560 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LQDI or VYM?
LQDI has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $14 per year of difference.
Which performed better, LQDI or VYM?
Over the past year LQDI returned -0.91% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), LQDI annualized +3.70% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, LQDI or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 9.1% for LQDI. Worst drawdown: LQDI -29.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both LQDI and VYM?
LQDI and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between LQDI and VYM?
LQDI and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 560 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, LQDI or VYM?
LQDI yields 4.60% while VYM yields 2.86%, so LQDI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.