KLMN vs VXUS
KLMN vs VXUS
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7860 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KLMN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.3B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.20% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 281 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +10.30% | +11.13% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.25% | +27.13% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +8.71% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -19.2% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 11, 2024 | Jan 26, 2011 |
KLMN vs VXUS Performance
Invesco MSCI North America Climate ETF (KLMN) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KLMN returned +20.25% while VXUS returned +27.13%. Year to date, KLMN is up 10.30% versus a gain of 11.13% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.3% for KLMN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.2% for KLMN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KLMN charges 0.09% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $5 annually, a gap of $4 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KLMN currently yields 1.20% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
KLMN and VXUS share 26 holdings out of 8104 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KLMN | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RY:CA | 0.50% | 0.53% | 0.03% |
| RD:CA | 0.36% | 0.37% | 0.01% |
| SHOP:CA | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.09% |
| ENB:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| AEM:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BMO:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BNS:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CM:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| WPM:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BN:CA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings KLMN shares with VXUS Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KLMN or VXUS?
KLMN has an expense ratio of 0.09% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $4 per year of difference.
Which performed better, KLMN or VXUS?
Over the past year KLMN returned +20.25% vs +27.13% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), KLMN annualized +15.05% vs +4.66% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, KLMN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.3% for KLMN. Worst drawdown: KLMN -19.2% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both KLMN and VXUS?
KLMN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between KLMN and VXUS?
KLMN and VXUS share 26 common holdings with a 3.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8104 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, KLMN or VXUS?
KLMN yields 1.20% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.