JMOM vs QQQ

Quick Verdict

JMOM has a lower expense ratio. JMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. JMOM offers more diversification with 274 holdings.

Lower Fees: JMOMHigher Returns: JMOMMore Diversified: JMOM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricJMOMQQQWinner
Expense Ratio0.12%0.18%
AUM$2.5B$455.8B
Dividend Yield0.86%0.41%
Holdings280108
YTD Return+22.99%+18.20%
1Y Return+31.41%+27.63%
3Y Return (annualized)+26.50%+25.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.39%+15.12%
Volatility (annualized)17.6%30.6%
Max Drawdown-34.3%-83.0%
Fund FamilyJ.P. Morgan Asset ManagementInvesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 8, 2017Mar 10, 1999

JMOM vs QQQ Performance

JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year JMOM returned +31.41% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, JMOM is up 22.99% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.

Over three years, JMOM compounded at +26.50% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.39% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, JMOM has the edge at +15.69% annualized vs +13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.6% for JMOM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for JMOM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

JMOM charges 0.12% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $18 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JMOM currently yields 0.86% against 0.41% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

37.0%overlap

JMOM and QQQ share 45 holdings out of 332 unique holdings combined, representing a 37.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in JMOMWeight in QQQDifference
NVDA1.99%7.88%5.89%
AAPL1.90%7.46%5.56%
MU2.84%4.67%1.83%
MSFTProProPro
AMDProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
METAProProPro
WMTProProPro
See all 10 holdings JMOM shares with QQQ
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, JMOM or QQQ?

JMOM has an expense ratio of 0.12% while QQQ charges 0.18%. JMOM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, JMOM or QQQ?

Over the past year JMOM returned +31.41% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so JMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), JMOM annualized +15.69% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, JMOM or QQQ?

QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.6% for JMOM. Worst drawdown: JMOM -34.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.

Should I hold both JMOM and QQQ?

JMOM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between JMOM and QQQ?

JMOM and QQQ share 45 common holdings with a 37.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 332 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, JMOM or QQQ?

JMOM yields 0.86% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so JMOM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →