IVV vs JMOM

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. JMOM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: JMOMMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVJMOMWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.12%
AUM$865.2B$2.5B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.86%
Holdings508280
YTD Return+13.80%+22.99%
1Y Return+23.70%+31.41%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+26.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+14.39%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)J.P. Morgan Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Nov 8, 2017

IVV vs JMOM Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and JPMorgan US Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) is a ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while JMOM returned +31.41%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 22.99% for JMOM.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +26.50% for JMOM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +14.39% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, JMOM has the edge at +15.69% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

JMOM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -34.3% for JMOM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while JMOM charges 0.12%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $12 annually, a gap of $9 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.86% for JMOM.

Holdings Overlap

40.8%overlap

IVV and JMOM share 149 holdings out of 630 unique holdings combined, representing a 40.8% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in JMOMDifference
NVDA7.76%1.99%5.77%
AAPL7.44%1.90%5.54%
MSFT4.57%1.54%3.03%
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
MUProProPro
AMZNProProPro
AMDProProPro
METAProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with JMOM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or JMOM?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while JMOM charges 0.12%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $9 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or JMOM?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +31.41% for JMOM, so JMOM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +15.69% for JMOM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or JMOM?

JMOM has been the more volatile fund at 17.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs JMOM -34.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and JMOM?

IVV and JMOM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and JMOM?

IVV and JMOM share 149 common holdings with a 40.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 630 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or JMOM?

IVV yields 1.09% while JMOM yields 0.86%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →