IXJ vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: VYM

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIXJVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.40%0.04%
AUM$4.1B$79.0B
Dividend Yield1.47%2.86%
Holdings125568
YTD Return+4.35%+15.45%
1Y Return+21.59%+26.05%
3Y Return (annualized)+7.37%+17.96%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.48%+12.54%
Volatility (annualized)13.2%14.6%
Max Drawdown-42.8%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 13, 2001Nov 10, 2006

IXJ vs VYM Performance

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXJ returned +21.59% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, IXJ is up 4.35% versus a gain of 15.45% for VYM.

Over three years, IXJ compounded at +7.37% per year against +17.96% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +4.48% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +6.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 13.2% for IXJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for IXJ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IXJ charges 0.40% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $4 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXJ currently yields 1.47% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

13.1%overlap

IXJ and VYM share 19 holdings out of 648 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.1% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IXJWeight in VYMDifference
JNJ7.07%2.62%4.45%
ABBV5.10%1.80%3.30%
UNH4.34%1.17%3.17%
MRKProProPro
AMGNProProPro
ABTProProPro
GILDProProPro
PFEProProPro
CVSProProPro
BMYProProPro
See all 10 holdings IXJ shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IXJ or VYM?

IXJ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IXJ or VYM?

Over the past year IXJ returned +21.59% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IXJ annualized +6.07% vs +7.06% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IXJ or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 13.2% for IXJ. Worst drawdown: IXJ -42.8% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IXJ and VYM?

IXJ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IXJ and VYM?

IXJ and VYM share 19 common holdings with a 13.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 648 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IXJ or VYM?

IXJ yields 1.47% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →