IXJ vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIXJVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.40%0.03%
AUM$4.1B$979.0B
Dividend Yield1.47%1.09%
Holdings125509
YTD Return+3.10%+13.53%
1Y Return+19.59%+23.65%
3Y Return (annualized)+6.94%+21.27%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.23%+13.52%
Volatility (annualized)13.2%14.1%
Max Drawdown-42.8%-34.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionNov 13, 2001Sep 7, 2010

IXJ vs VOO Performance

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IXJ returned +19.59% while VOO returned +23.65%. Year to date, IXJ is up 3.10% versus a gain of 13.53% for VOO.

Over three years, IXJ compounded at +6.94% per year against +21.27% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +4.23% and +13.52% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +6.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 13.2% for IXJ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -42.8% for IXJ and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IXJ charges 0.40% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $3 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IXJ currently yields 1.47% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

9.0%overlap

IXJ and VOO share 60 holdings out of 554 unique holdings combined, representing a 9.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IXJWeight in VOODifference
LLY10.75%1.47%9.28%
JNJ7.07%0.95%6.12%
ABBV5.10%0.69%4.41%
UNHProProPro
MRKProProPro
ROPProProPro
AMGNProProPro
TMOProProPro
ABTProProPro
GILDProProPro
See all 10 holdings IXJ shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IXJ or VOO?

IXJ has an expense ratio of 0.40% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IXJ or VOO?

Over the past year IXJ returned +19.59% vs +23.65% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IXJ annualized +6.02% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IXJ or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 13.2% for IXJ. Worst drawdown: IXJ -42.8% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both IXJ and VOO?

IXJ and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IXJ and VOO?

IXJ and VOO share 60 common holdings with a 9.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 554 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IXJ or VOO?

IXJ yields 1.47% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IXJ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →