IWV vs VYM

Quick Verdict

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWV offers more diversification with 1670 holdings.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYMMore Diversified: IWV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIWVVYMWinner
Expense Ratio0.20%0.04%
AUM$19.5B$79.0B
Dividend Yield0.87%2.86%
Holdings2,596568
YTD Return+13.14%+15.20%
1Y Return+22.77%+25.56%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.39%+17.86%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.07%+12.35%
Volatility (annualized)15.6%14.6%
Max Drawdown-56.7%-58.8%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 22, 2000Nov 10, 2006

IWV vs VYM Performance

iShares Russell 3000 ETF (IWV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWV returned +22.77% while VYM returned +25.56%. Year to date, IWV is up 13.14% versus a gain of 15.20% for VYM.

Over three years, IWV compounded at +20.39% per year against +17.86% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +12.07% and +12.35% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IWV has the edge at +7.22% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IWV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.7% for IWV and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IWV charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWV currently yields 0.87% against 2.86% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

29.6%overlap

IWV and VYM share 371 holdings out of 1857 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IWVWeight in VYMDifference
AVGO2.39%6.47%4.08%
JPM:US1.24%3.36%2.12%
XOM0.78%2.83%2.05%
JNJProProPro
WMTProProPro
ABBVProProPro
PGProProPro
HDProProPro
CATProProPro
CSCOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IWV shares with VYM
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IWV or VYM?

IWV has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IWV or VYM?

Over the past year IWV returned +22.77% vs +25.56% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), IWV annualized +7.22% vs +7.05% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IWV or VYM?

IWV has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IWV -56.7% vs VYM -58.8%.

Should I hold both IWV and VYM?

IWV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IWV and VYM?

IWV and VYM share 371 common holdings with a 29.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1857 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IWV or VYM?

IWV yields 0.87% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →