IVV vs XCLR

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVXCLRWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.25%
AUM$865.2B$4M
Dividend Yield1.09%12.80%
Holdings508509
YTD Return+13.80%+5.19%
1Y Return+23.70%+11.53%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+13.72%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+7.91%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%10.9%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-14.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Global X by mirae Asset
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 25, 2021

IVV vs XCLR Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Global X S&P 500 Collar 95-110 ETF (XCLR) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while XCLR returned +11.53%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 5.19% for XCLR.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +13.72% for XCLR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +7.91% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, XCLR has the edge at +7.91% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 10.9% for XCLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -14.6% for XCLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.93. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while XCLR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 12.80% for XCLR.

Holdings Overlap

48.0%overlap

IVV and XCLR share 454 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 48.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in XCLRDifference
AMAT0.69%7.29%6.60%
NVDA7.76%0.01%7.75%
AAPL7.44%0.01%7.43%
WMTProProPro
MSFTProProPro
CATProProPro
CSCOProProPro
AMZNProProPro
ABBVProProPro
MAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with XCLR
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or XCLR?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XCLR charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or XCLR?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +11.53% for XCLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +7.91% for XCLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or XCLR?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 10.9% for XCLR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs XCLR -14.6%.

Should I hold both IVV and XCLR?

IVV and XCLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.93, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and XCLR?

IVV and XCLR share 454 common holdings with a 48.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or XCLR?

IVV yields 1.09% while XCLR yields 12.80%, so XCLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →