IVV vs WOMN

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVWOMNWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.75%
AUM$865.2B$56M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.15%
Holdings508204
YTD Return+13.80%+10.12%
1Y Return+23.70%+17.18%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+14.43%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%+9.40%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.7%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-32.2%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Impact shares
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Aug 24, 2018

IVV vs WOMN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) is a ETF from Impact shares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while WOMN returned +17.18%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 10.12% for WOMN.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +14.43% for WOMN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.43% and +9.40% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, WOMN has the edge at +12.98% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

WOMN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -32.2% for WOMN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while WOMN charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $75 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.15% for WOMN.

Holdings Overlap

39.0%overlap

IVV and WOMN share 181 holdings out of 527 unique holdings combined, representing a 39.0% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in WOMNDifference
NVDA7.76%4.24%3.52%
MSFT4.57%4.65%0.08%
GOOGL3.15%4.40%1.25%
JPM:USProProPro
CSCOProProPro
XOMProProPro
VZProProPro
VProProPro
TXNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with WOMN
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or WOMN?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOMN charges 0.75%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or WOMN?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +17.18% for WOMN, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +12.98% for WOMN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or WOMN?

WOMN has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs WOMN -32.2%.

Should I hold both IVV and WOMN?

IVV and WOMN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and WOMN?

IVV and WOMN share 181 common holdings with a 39.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 527 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or WOMN?

IVV yields 1.09% while WOMN yields 1.15%, so WOMN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →