IVV vs VSDB
IVV vs VSDB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | VSDB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.15% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $896M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.16% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 833 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | -0.73% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +1.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -1.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 1, 2025 |
IVV vs VSDB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF (VSDB) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while VSDB returned +1.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a loss of 0.73% for VSDB.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.0% for VSDB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -1.8% for VSDB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while VSDB charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $15 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.16% for VSDB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and VSDB share 0 holdings out of 579 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or VSDB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VSDB charges 0.15%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or VSDB?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +1.69% for VSDB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +3.80% for VSDB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or VSDB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.0% for VSDB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VSDB -1.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and VSDB?
IVV and VSDB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VSDB?
IVV and VSDB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 579 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VSDB?
IVV yields 1.09% while VSDB yields 4.16%, so VSDB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.