IVV vs VPU

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVVPUWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.09%
AUM$865.2B$8.7B
Dividend Yield1.09%2.86%
Holdings50870
YTD Return+13.31%+2.08%
1Y Return+24.00%+3.78%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+14.12%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+8.32%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%13.9%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-48.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 26, 2004

IVV vs VPU Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while VPU returned +3.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 2.08% for VPU.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +14.12% for VPU; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +8.32% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.9% for VPU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -48.4% for VPU. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while VPU charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.86% for VPU.

Holdings Overlap

2.2%overlap

IVV and VPU share 31 holdings out of 542 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in VPUDifference
NEE0.28%11.60%11.32%
SO0.16%6.84%6.68%
DUK0.15%6.24%6.09%
CEGProProPro
AEPProProPro
SREProProPro
DProProPro
VSTProProPro
ETRProProPro
XELProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with VPU
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or VPU?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VPU charges 0.09%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or VPU?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +3.78% for VPU, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +6.88% for VPU. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or VPU?

IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.9% for VPU. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VPU -48.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and VPU?

IVV and VPU have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VPU?

IVV and VPU share 31 common holdings with a 2.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 542 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VPU?

IVV yields 1.09% while VPU yields 2.86%, so VPU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →