IVV vs VO

Quick Verdict

IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVVOWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$865.2B$105.9B
Dividend Yield1.09%1.53%
Holdings508293
YTD Return+13.31%+13.64%
1Y Return+24.00%+17.69%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+15.64%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+8.00%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.9%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-60.3%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jan 26, 2004

IVV vs VO Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while VO returned +17.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 13.64% for VO.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +15.64% for VO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +8.00% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VO has the edge at +9.21% annualized vs +7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -60.3% for VO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while VO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.53% for VO.

Holdings Overlap

15.6%overlap

IVV and VO share 239 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 15.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in VODifference
VRT0.18%1.22%1.04%
STX0.31%1.05%0.74%
WDC0.29%1.06%0.77%
HWMProProPro
PWRProProPro
CMIProProPro
DDOGProProPro
CEGProProPro
HOODProProPro
VLOProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with VO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or VO?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VO charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or VO?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +17.69% for VO, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +9.21% for VO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or VO?

VO has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs VO -60.3%.

Should I hold both IVV and VO?

IVV and VO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and VO?

IVV and VO share 239 common holdings with a 15.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or VO?

IVV yields 1.09% while VO yields 1.53%, so VO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →