IVV vs UBND
IVV vs UBND
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. UBND offers more diversification with 821 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | UBND | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.40% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $2.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 4.74% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 1,425 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | -0.08% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.48% | +2.50% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.86% | +4.94% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.4% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Victory Capital Management Inc. | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Oct 4, 2021 |
IVV vs UBND Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VictoryShares Core Plus Bond ETF (UBND) is a ETF from Victory Capital Management Inc.. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while UBND returned +2.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a loss of 0.08% for UBND.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +4.94% for UBND. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs +0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.4% for UBND. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.4% for UBND. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while UBND charges 0.40%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $40 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 4.74% for UBND.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and UBND share 0 holdings out of 1326 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or UBND?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while UBND charges 0.40%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $37 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or UBND?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +2.50% for UBND, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs +0.81% for UBND. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or UBND?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.4% for UBND. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs UBND -16.4%.
Should I hold both IVV and UBND?
IVV and UBND have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and UBND?
IVV and UBND share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1326 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or UBND?
IVV yields 1.09% while UBND yields 4.74%, so UBND currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.