IVV vs TOK

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. TOK offers more diversification with 892 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: TOK

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVTOKWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.25%
AUM$865.2B$247M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.31%
Holdings5081,136
YTD Return+13.31%+12.52%
1Y Return+24.00%+23.36%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+20.19%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+11.88%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%16.5%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-56.6%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)iShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Dec 10, 2007

IVV vs TOK Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF (TOK) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while TOK returned +23.36%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 12.52% for TOK.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +20.19% for TOK; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +11.88% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TOK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -56.6% for TOK. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while TOK charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $25 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.31% for TOK.

Holdings Overlap

70.1%overlap

IVV and TOK share 386 holdings out of 1011 unique holdings combined, representing a 70.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in TOKDifference
NVDA7.76%5.32%2.44%
AAPL7.44%5.41%2.03%
MSFT4.57%3.22%1.35%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with TOK
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or TOK?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TOK charges 0.25%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or TOK?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +23.36% for TOK, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +6.92% for TOK. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or TOK?

TOK has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TOK -56.6%.

Should I hold both IVV and TOK?

IVV and TOK have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TOK?

IVV and TOK share 386 common holdings with a 70.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1011 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TOK?

IVV yields 1.09% while TOK yields 1.31%, so TOK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →