IVV vs TFLR
IVV vs TFLR
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TFLR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.61% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $671M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 6.79% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 347 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +2.24% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +5.14% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | +7.21% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 2.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -4.0% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | T.Rowe Price | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Nov 16, 2022 |
IVV vs TFLR Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while TFLR returned +5.14%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 2.24% for TFLR.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +7.21% for TFLR. Across the full 4-year window we track, TFLR has the edge at +7.59% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 2.5% for TFLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -4.0% for TFLR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TFLR charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $61 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 6.79% for TFLR.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TFLR share 0 holdings out of 676 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TFLR?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TFLR charges 0.61%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TFLR?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +5.14% for TFLR, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +7.59% for TFLR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TFLR?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 2.5% for TFLR. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TFLR -4.0%.
Should I hold both IVV and TFLR?
IVV and TFLR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TFLR?
IVV and TFLR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 676 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TFLR?
IVV yields 1.09% while TFLR yields 6.79%, so TFLR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.