IVV vs TDSB
IVV vs TDSB
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | TDSB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.91% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $49M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.28% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 11 | |
| YTD Return | +13.13% | +4.01% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.90% | +11.78% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.08% | +8.45% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | +1.46% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 7.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -19.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | The Cabana Group, LLC | |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 16, 2020 |
IVV vs TDSB Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ETC Cabana Target Beta ETF (TDSB) is a ETF from The Cabana Group, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% while TDSB returned +11.78%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.13% versus a gain of 4.01% for TDSB.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.08% per year against +8.45% for TDSB; over five years the annualized figures are +13.27% and +1.46% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.02% annualized vs +2.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 7.7% for TDSB. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -19.6% for TDSB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while TDSB charges 0.91%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $91 annually, a gap of $88 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 2.28% for TDSB.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and TDSB share 0 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or TDSB?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while TDSB charges 0.91%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $88 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or TDSB?
Over the past year IVV returned +22.90% vs +11.78% for TDSB, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), IVV annualized +7.02% vs +2.09% for TDSB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or TDSB?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 7.7% for TDSB. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs TDSB -19.6%.
Should I hold both IVV and TDSB?
IVV and TDSB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and TDSB?
IVV and TDSB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or TDSB?
IVV yields 1.09% while TDSB yields 2.28%, so TDSB currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.