IVV vs SWTSX

Quick Verdict

IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. SWTSX offers more diversification with 2963 holdings.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: SWTSX

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSWTSXWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.03%
AUM$865.2B$43.8B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.99%
Holdings5082,987
YTD Return+13.31%+13.87%
1Y Return+24.00%-82.49%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%-37.47%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%-24.98%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%41.7%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-86.0%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Charles Schwab Asset Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Jun 1, 1999

IVV vs SWTSX Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Schwab Total Stock Market Index Fund (SWTSX) is a mutual fund from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while SWTSX returned -82.49%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 13.87% for SWTSX.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against -37.47% for SWTSX; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and -24.98% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs -24.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SWTSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 41.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -86.0% for SWTSX. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SWTSX charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.99% for SWTSX.

Holdings Overlap

79.1%overlap

IVV and SWTSX share 481 holdings out of 2987 unique holdings combined, representing a 79.1% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SWTSXDifference
NVDA7.76%6.91%0.85%
AAPL7.44%5.70%1.74%
MSFT4.57%4.76%0.19%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
BRK.BProProPro
LLYProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with SWTSX
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SWTSX?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SWTSX charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or SWTSX?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs -82.49% for SWTSX, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs -24.98% for SWTSX. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or SWTSX?

SWTSX has been the more volatile fund at 41.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SWTSX -86.0%.

Should I hold both IVV and SWTSX?

IVV and SWTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SWTSX?

IVV and SWTSX share 481 common holdings with a 79.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2987 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SWTSX?

IVV yields 1.09% while SWTSX yields 0.99%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →