IVV vs STXM
IVV vs STXM
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Strive Mid Cap ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | STXM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $16M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 1.04% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 407 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +1.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.70% | +18.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.49% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.43% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -23.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Strive Asset Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Apr 11, 2024 |
IVV vs STXM Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Strive Mid Cap ETF (STXM) is a ETF from Strive Asset Management. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while STXM returned +18.69%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 1.23% for STXM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.6% for STXM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.8% for STXM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while STXM charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $18 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.04% for STXM.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and STXM share 56 holdings out of 844 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IVV | Weight in STXM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| SNDK | 0.36% | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| CIEN | 0.09% | 0.71% | 0.62% |
| COHR | 0.10% | 0.54% | 0.44% |
| CASY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| KEY | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| CHRW | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| SNA | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| PNR | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| LITE | Pro | Pro | Pro |
| BG | Pro | Pro | Pro |
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with STXM Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position. Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime. | |||
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or STXM?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while STXM charges 0.18%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or STXM?
Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +18.69% for STXM, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +8.46% for STXM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or STXM?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.6% for STXM. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs STXM -23.8%.
Should I hold both IVV and STXM?
IVV and STXM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and STXM?
IVV and STXM share 56 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 844 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or STXM?
IVV yields 1.09% while STXM yields 1.04%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.