IVV vs SSFI
IVV vs SSFI
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Day Hagan Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SSFI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.76% | |
| AUM | $865.2B | $29M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 3.55% | |
| Holdings | 508 | 10 | |
| YTD Return | +11.54% | -0.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.48% | +1.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.86% | +3.12% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.02% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 6.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -16.1% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Day Hagan Funds | |
| Category | Equity | Fixed Income | |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Sep 28, 2021 |
IVV vs SSFI Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Day Hagan Smart Sector Fixed Income ETF (SSFI) is a ETF from Day Hagan Funds. Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% while SSFI returned +1.38%. Year to date, IVV is up 11.54% versus a loss of 0.53% for SSFI.
Over three years, IVV compounded at +20.86% per year against +3.12% for SSFI. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.97% annualized vs -0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.1% for SSFI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -16.1% for SSFI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SSFI charges 0.76%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $76 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 3.55% for SSFI.
Holdings Overlap
IVV and SSFI share 0 holdings out of 514 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SSFI?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SSFI charges 0.76%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $73 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IVV or SSFI?
Over the past year IVV returned +21.48% vs +1.38% for SSFI, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IVV annualized +6.97% vs -0.39% for SSFI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IVV or SSFI?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.1% for SSFI. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SSFI -16.1%.
Should I hold both IVV and SSFI?
IVV and SSFI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SSFI?
IVV and SSFI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 514 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SSFI?
IVV yields 1.09% while SSFI yields 3.55%, so SSFI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.