IVV vs SPYG

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. SPYG delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: SPYGMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSPYGWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.04%
AUM$865.2B$50.7B
Dividend Yield1.09%0.48%
Holdings508149
YTD Return+13.31%+14.81%
1Y Return+24.00%+25.55%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.16%+26.55%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.34%+13.93%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.7%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-69.7%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 25, 2000

IVV vs SPYG Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% while SPYG returned +25.55%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.31% versus a gain of 14.81% for SPYG.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.16% per year against +26.55% for SPYG; over five years the annualized figures are +13.34% and +13.93% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.03% annualized vs +6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPYG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -69.7% for SPYG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPYG charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $4 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.48% for SPYG.

Holdings Overlap

18.9%overlap

IVV and SPYG share 17 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.9% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SPYGDifference
AAPL7.44%6.49%0.95%
MSFT4.57%8.13%3.56%
AMZN3.75%3.58%0.17%
AMDProProPro
AMATProProPro
GEVProProPro
APHProProPro
AMGNProProPro
AXPProProPro
BAProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with SPYG
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SPYG?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPYG charges 0.04%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or SPYG?

Over the past year IVV returned +24.00% vs +25.55% for SPYG, so SPYG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), IVV annualized +7.03% vs +6.64% for SPYG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or SPYG?

SPYG has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SPYG -69.7%.

Should I hold both IVV and SPYG?

IVV and SPYG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SPYG?

IVV and SPYG share 17 common holdings with a 18.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPYG?

IVV yields 1.09% while SPYG yields 0.48%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →