IVV vs SPXN

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. SPXN delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: SPXNMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSPXNWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.09%
AUM$865.2B$76M
Dividend Yield1.09%0.90%
Holdings508397
YTD Return+13.52%+14.67%
1Y Return+23.63%+25.50%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.26%+21.51%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.52%+13.87%
Volatility (annualized)15.1%15.6%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-32.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)ProShares
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Sep 22, 2015

IVV vs SPXN Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and ProShares S&P 500 Ex-Financials ETF (SPXN) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% while SPXN returned +25.50%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.52% versus a gain of 14.67% for SPXN.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.26% per year against +21.51% for SPXN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.52% and +13.87% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, SPXN has the edge at +14.91% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SPXN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -32.1% for SPXN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SPXN charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $9 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 0.90% for SPXN.

Holdings Overlap

84.3%overlap

IVV and SPXN share 385 holdings out of 516 unique holdings combined, representing a 84.3% weight overlap.

High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SPXNDifference
NVDA7.76%8.49%0.73%
AAPL7.44%8.23%0.79%
MSFT4.57%5.16%0.59%
AMZNProProPro
GOOGLProProPro
AVGOProProPro
GOOGProProPro
METAProProPro
TSLAProProPro
MUProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with SPXN
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SPXN?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SPXN charges 0.09%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $6 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or SPXN?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.63% vs +25.50% for SPXN, so SPXN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), IVV annualized +7.04% vs +14.91% for SPXN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or SPXN?

SPXN has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SPXN -32.1%.

Should I hold both IVV and SPXN?

IVV and SPXN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SPXN?

IVV and SPXN share 385 common holdings with a 84.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 516 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SPXN?

IVV yields 1.09% while SPXN yields 0.90%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →