IVV vs SMOT

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: IVVMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIVVSMOTWinner
Expense Ratio0.03%0.49%
AUM$865.2B$328M
Dividend Yield1.09%1.28%
Holdings508116
YTD Return+13.80%+11.88%
1Y Return+23.70%+16.39%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.49%+11.13%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.43%-
Volatility (annualized)15.1%17.1%
Max Drawdown-56.5%-23.4%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)VanEck
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionMay 15, 2000Oct 4, 2022

IVV vs SMOT Performance

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and VanEck Morningstar SMID Moat ETF (SMOT) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% while SMOT returned +16.39%. Year to date, IVV is up 13.80% versus a gain of 11.88% for SMOT.

Over three years, IVV compounded at +21.49% per year against +11.13% for SMOT. Across the full 4-year window we track, SMOT has the edge at +13.39% annualized vs +7.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SMOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for IVV and -23.4% for SMOT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMOT charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $49 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.09% against 1.28% for SMOT.

Holdings Overlap

3.5%overlap

IVV and SMOT share 70 holdings out of 545 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in IVVWeight in SMOTDifference
TECH0.02%1.70%1.68%
CTVA0.09%1.49%1.40%
IQV0.05%1.47%1.42%
MASProProPro
SQProProPro
CIProProPro
MDLZProProPro
BIIBProProPro
AMCRProProPro
ABNBProProPro
See all 10 holdings IVV shares with SMOT
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IVV or SMOT?

IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMOT charges 0.49%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $46 per year of difference.

Which performed better, IVV or SMOT?

Over the past year IVV returned +23.70% vs +16.39% for SMOT, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IVV annualized +7.05% vs +13.39% for SMOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, IVV or SMOT?

SMOT has been the more volatile fund at 17.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IVV -56.5% vs SMOT -23.4%.

Should I hold both IVV and SMOT?

IVV and SMOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between IVV and SMOT?

IVV and SMOT share 70 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 545 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMOT?

IVV yields 1.09% while SMOT yields 1.28%, so SMOT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →